Skip to main content
Ramblio

  • Colton2003

    like I said, if it’s AI prove it. Number two, even if you think that for some weird bizarre reason, that doesn’t erase these statistics. Also saying men don’t have disadvantages is dishonest. Whenever our country goes to war, men are drafted without any say in it, while women can decline. By law, a man is responsible for their child until they turn 18 and if the couple breaks up is forced to pay child support. But a woman is not held to the same standard if they decide that they no longer want to take care of their child. I’m not saying men shouldn’t take care of their child, I’m not advocating for that at all. But I do think we should have the same standard for men and women because it takes two people to tango.

    Loading reactions…

  • Sufe

    I will also point out that you guys are literally arguing with a 23-year-old. Oh I'm sorry, soon to be or probably just turned 24 year-old? Who I'm sure has all the life experience, and mental and intellectual development to really engage in good faith with an argument like this. So can we adults in the room stop giving this post life? Thanks. 🔞🤣

    Loading reactions…

  • Colton2003

    Ah yes, because apparently age and experience are exclusive memberships, and nobody under a certain age is capable of research, critical thinking, or having relevant life experience. 😂 Experience can absolutely matter, but birthdays aren’t credentials, and being older doesn’t automatically make your argument more factual.

    Loading reactions…

  • Sufe

    Well, you lying about using AI is a sign of an under developed brain I would say. Considering that your other written posts are riddled with typos and misspellings. Including the very title of your post so yes. I think that this is the last thing I will say on it. Lol

    Loading reactions…

  • Colton2003

    once again, you throw around the AI argument without any evidence.

    Loading reactions…

  • Colton2003

    I believe you’re using AI isn’t evidence. How did we get to a point where people confuse their opinions for evidence or facts?

    Loading reactions…

  • Doug Lee

    Loading reactions…

  • Dan 26

    Well, Doug Lee, the number of cases and how they are handled by the state and how they are perceived culturally does matter in fact, when you are claiming a double standard.

    Loading reactions…

  • Doug Lee

    @Dan 26 The term "double standard" was not one of the issues I addressed. This was deliberate; I addressed what I could address quickly out of the many issues in this thread.

    Loading reactions…

  • King Tripple Whopper

    Much of the peer-reviewed literature centers on whether IPV rates are symmetric (similar for men and women) or asymmetric (predominantly male-perpetrated). A 2024 study in Journal of Interpersonal Violence using the Partner Victimization Scale in Spain found gender asymmetry (more female than male victimization) on four of five violence items, with IPV also associated with worse consequences for women.

    Loading reactions…

  • King Tripple Whopper

    https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10668541/Evidence of Gender Asymmetry in Intimate Partner Violence Experience at the Population-Level Janet L Fanslow1, Brooklyn M Mellar1, Pauline J Gulliver1, Tracey K D McIntosh

    Loading reactions…

  • Lynnie

    Replying to  @king_tripple_whopper: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10668541/Evidence of Gender Asymmetry i

    404

    Loading reactions…

  • Lynnie

    OK. So we’re still using AI. Cool story.

    Loading reactions…

  • King Tripple Whopper

    Yes using AI to get an NIH article. Glad you liked it.

    Loading reactions…

  • Colton2003

    funny how the person who is complaining about AI is hiding behind a screen and has no rambles😂😂 so we know nothing of what they sound like, that’s why they’re really to be so tough.

    Loading reactions…

  • Lynnie

    So you were gonna go stop my profile? Creepy. You know exactly what I sound like. I’ve left audio responses here. Nice deflecting though. That’s cute.

    Loading reactions…

  • Colton2003

    O yes, creepy to view publicly available pages. Calm the fuck down, it’s not like I docked you and went looking for your phone number, email address, home address, etc.

    Loading reactions…

  • Dan 26

    Real question: can we trust the NIH anymore? I say this because of Trump and doge. Unapologetically. What are your thoughts?

    Loading reactions…

  • Dan 26

    I mean, they are already hiding data on things like inflation and unemployment. Do we trust NIH still? Real question

    Loading reactions…

  • Dan 26

    OK Colton, but why is that the case? This is the big question for our time. Many many other countries don’t have so little representation. Why do you think our government does not work for us? My Answer, in brief, is because it has been taken over by the corporations, and the ruling class is running us regardless of any elections they may purchase. I mean this in a non-partisan way. what do you say?

    Loading reactions…

  • Lynnie

    Loading reactions…

  • Lynnie

    Also KTW, didn’t you say, fuck this thread, and yet you’re still here.

    Loading reactions…

  • Dan 26

    Colton, I agree with you, corporations have been running this country since the early 1980s. Probably before you were born lol. But now they are running the very elections. There was a time when it wasn’t this way, and that was the most prosperous time for the United States, when things like social security and Medicare and regulations or created. That’s what I’m saying

    Loading reactions…

  • Dan 26

    Maybe the fact that you can’t imagine a time when corporations weren’t running you speaks to the fact that they have taken over so completely, even before you were born. But the remnants of a time when the ruling class didn’t control us are still all around us. That’s where the fight is

    Loading reactions…

  • King Tripple Whopper

    https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10668541/

    Loading reactions…

  • LordLundin

    https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10668541/

    Loading reactions…

  • LordLundin

    You know, for a moment I thought that it was AI gen because AI has a habit of making up sources that naturally lead to 404, but it doesn't take a big brain to find the actual article. This thread is seriously full of fucking smooth brains and at this rate I don't care how many enemies I make. Have whatever fucking opinions you like, just don't be an idiot about it.

    Loading reactions…

  • LordLundin

    Wait I know, this is a psy op. It's gotta be at this rate. LMFAO.

    Loading reactions…

  • LordLundin

    TBF Colton the first link he posted lead to a 404 if you copied the whole message. You know what I did then? I entered the link into the google search field, and while google is a pile of crap these days it can still find academic articles. Verify the doi and authors. don't want to read the article but it's actually fairly famous and I've seen it past around. I think there's also a danger of overrelying on one article so when I wake up I'll see what I can find. Even if said finding goes against my "narrative".

    Loading reactions…

  • Lynnie

    It’s not the article I have a problem with. By KTW ‘s on admission, it supports what Dan and I were saying. As I said, it’s the use of AI and research that really bothers me.

    Loading reactions…

  • Lynnie

    Replying to  @LordLundin: You know, for a moment I thought that it was AI gen because AI has a habit of ma

    Well then, it’s a good goddamn thing, I couldn’t even give one single solitary micro fuck about what you think of my intellectual ability. Go tell your mama or somebody else who might even remotely care.

    Loading reactions…

  • Lynnie

    You don’t even go here.

    Loading reactions…

  • LordLundin

    My question is why even try? You know you're making ... well I wouldn't even call them arguments. I refuse to believe that you're that dumb to where your argument style would resort to that of a preschooler. Why the hostility and personal attacks? Why make these arguments then dip out and say "I don't care what people think". If not having people care what you think wasn't the goal, then what was it? Because I can't imagine it was swaying anyone's opinion on the matter. My goal here is to call out intelectual dishonesty, no matter who's side it is coming from, because we don't need more vibes based politics in our lives, thank you. Please, entertain me for a moment will you?

    Loading reactions…

  • Lynnie

    You were the one who initiated with comments about smooth brains. I’m not at all concerned with your perception of who was being intellectually dishonest. Because it wasn’t me. Why don’t you stick to getting plastered and verbally vomiting irreverent, racist, misogynistic, homophobic garbage all over this app, like you did the other one. See how far that gets you.

    Loading reactions…

  • LordLundin

    So, you're not gonna play? Gotcha. Troll confirmed.

    Loading reactions…

  • Lynnie

    Typical weak ass men. Put words into my mouth. Accuse me of things I never said. Hurl insults, and then when I dare to defend myself, they block me. It figures. That totally tracks.

    Loading reactions…

Log in to comment