Ramblio

Log in to comment

• Selina Lynnette

  12/30/2025, 1:03:48 PM Play

• Brando, Balance

  12/30/2025, 3:58:18 AM Play

• King Tripple Whopper

  12/30/2025, 3:04:10 AM Play

• International Friends Network

  12/30/2025, 3:01:24 AM

  @JAM66 FR FR. We're not going to bash you for this. not at all friend. The way that you said what you said, was very clever actually, well done ay?

• JAM66 FR FR

  12/30/2025, 2:48:39 AM Play

• International Friends Network

  12/30/2025, 2:30:49 AM Play

• Fred

  12/30/2025, 2:11:45 AM Play

• International Friends Network

  12/30/2025, 1:45:57 AM

  You're not the only one that's noticed that. We made 2 episodes talking about this topic . Thank you for posting this.

• Jim,man of GOD, friend to GOD

  12/30/2025, 1:24:21 AM Play

• King Tripple Whopper

  12/30/2025, 1:09:50 AM Play

• Gordon

  12/30/2025, 12:35:06 AM

  I really thought I was listening to Kamala Harris when I listened to this post. I had to check myself.

• James

  12/29/2025, 11:53:20 PM Play

• Nicole a.k.a. the Brassknucklebeauty

  12/29/2025, 11:45:03 PM

  I know some of you are going to disagree with this. Before you do, pause. When people say, “If you signed up for social media, you signed up for this,” no — I didn’t. I signed the terms of service agreement. Those rules exist for a reason. If this were someone you knew or loved, would you really tell them to “just block people” while they’re being harassed? Because that’s not strength — that’s victim-blaming. Blocking is a tool. It’s a personal boundary. It was never meant to manage or stop harm inside a community. And it doesn’t matter if you have one follower or one million — everyone deserves a basic expectation of safety under the rules we all agreed to. What’s making this worse is moderator tone. Telling people to “grow up” or “grow a pair” isn’t leadership — it’s escalation. Moderators aren’t here to dismiss harm; they’re here to mitigate it. Explicit content is one issue. Ongoing harassment and bullying is another. Both require clarity, consistency, and follow-through. And let’s be very clear about this: it is not up to a moderator’s personal feelings, beliefs, or emotional reactions to decide whether a rule was broken. Enforcement isn’t based on vibes, toughness, or a “just deal with it” mindset. It’s based on the standards YOU set and the rules YOU agreed to enforce. Right now, the people breaking the rules aren’t being checked. The people calling it out are. That’s backwards. If YOU are the creator or part of the moderation team, YOU have to take the emotionality out of it and apply the terms of service exactly as written. That means clearly defining what counts as bullying and what counts as harassment — no guesswork, no moving goalposts. If everyone is confused about the rules, how are we supposed to move forward? Clear rules stop chaos. Vibes don’t. And yes — this is literally what I do. I work with corporations and organizations on crisis response, moderation breakdowns, and harm mitigation. A post like this, with this level of clarity, is typically a $3,000 deliverable in an active crisis situation. You’re welcome. If blocking fixed bullying, we wouldn’t still be having this conversation.

• JAM66 FR FR

  12/29/2025, 11:26:59 PM Play